Nora: I also think that it will

rigite2542@artg

Now simply be easier for Google to identify really natural links, because webmasters may now have a greater incentive to link more honestly because they now say “yes, okay, so this link It's just sponsored that I get there, and that has a bit of a positive effect for me." So maybe that also increases the quality overall. Julian: There are a lot of people who no longer dare to link with follow, and a lot of newspapers now generally link with “nofollow”. And now they can say in the future, okay, we'll link with “nofollow”, but not with sponsored, right.

So that means Google can now distinguish between an advertorial and an I-don't-dare link in the Special Data newspaper, yes? So roughly. Or a follow link, which might actually have been bought correctly. So the question is, what happens now? Will all links be set to nofollow now, just to be safe? Probably no/ Felix: Well, I found it interesting what Jan Martin wrote, because of course it was true that “nofollow” didn’t necessarily have to be counted. So you don't know 100 percent, so internally they did a test and internal links were actually no longer crawled.



Then I assume that it was really tight as far as crawling was concerned. But that it is really valued. So I was also worried or I'm currently worried that if I have a lot of "nofollow" links that are somehow spamming, then I would also say, to be on the safe side, devalue them all with a (incomprehensible #00:15:58- 1#) Tools. I wouldn't be 100 percent sure today how dangerous or how helpful these "nofollow" links are, so we now know that we definitely have to take them into account for the future. And that is actually very grateful information.