As an effect of the designation until the
Ato art. and art. of the Criminal Code from the notion of particularly serious consequences meant damage greater than lei. Art. of the Criminal Code from in the sense of defining the notion of particularly serious consequences as representing material damage greater than lei was amended only on August after the defendant committed the alleged act of complicity in abuse in service in qualified form. . On the other hand according to the criticized text respectively art. para. from Law no. all the amounts in old currency provided in the.Normative acts issued before July are replaced by the amounts in new Country Email List currency by dividing by . . Thus the question arises whether art. of the Criminal Code from was modified or not by the provisions of art. para. from Law no.entry into force of Law no. . . Such an argument cannot be accepted because Law no. is an ordinary law and the Criminal Code an organic law. However an ordinary law cannot modify an organic law. . In conclusion the provisions of art. para. from Law no. affects the provisions of art. para. of the.
https://zh-cn.buylead.me/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/roslin-country-email-list-300x175.jpg
Constitution to the extent that they modified the provisions of art. of the Criminal Code of in the version prior to its amendment by Law no. . . At the same time the provisions of art. para. from Law no. affects the constitutional provisions of art. paragraph and because the provisions of art. regarding the modification of a normative act and art. regarding implicit legislative events both from Law no. on legislative technical norms for the elaboration of normative acts. Thus according to these latter provisions for the normative expression of the.
頁:
[1]